Semaglutide and the other GLP-1 receptor agonists are among the most widely prescribed medicines in the country, taken by millions of people for type 2 diabetes and for weight loss. Researchers have now tied them to NAION — non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy, an injury often described as a stroke of the optic nerve. Blood flow to the optic nerve is cut off, and the sight lost in the affected eye is generally permanent. A 2025 study in JAMA Ophthalmology examined patients who developed optic-nerve disorders while taking these drugs, most with NAION-like findings. Researchers at Harvard's Mass Eye and Ear reported that diabetic patients taking semaglutide were four times more likely to develop NAION, and that patients taking it for weight loss faced roughly seven times the risk.
In December 2025, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation consolidated the federal vision-loss cases into MDL 3163 in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, before Judge Karen S. Marston — a proceeding separate from the earlier MDL covering gastrointestinal injuries. New Jersey's state courts have likewise separated the vision claims from the gastrointestinal ones. The litigation is in early discovery, and no global settlement has been reached. The central allegation is that the manufacturers knew enough to warn patients and prescribing physicians about a risk of sudden, irreversible blindness — and did not.
If you lost your sight after taking a GLP-1 medication, the law provides a path to accountability.
Every detail you share through this case review — your prescription history, the pharmacy that filled it, and your ophthalmology and diagnostic testing records — stays between you and our intake team. We do not sell, rent, or share your information with third parties, and your participation is never made public.
Damages vary by case, and every patient's situation is different. Common categories of damages in pharmaceutical failure-to-warn matters include:
Emergency evaluation, imaging and visual-field testing, neuro-ophthalmology referrals, and the treatment attempted after the vision loss began.
Low-vision therapy, orientation and mobility training, magnification and screen-reading equipment, and the ongoing cost of adapting to permanent sight loss.
Wages lost during diagnosis and recovery, and the lasting loss where the work depended on sight or on holding a driver's licence.
Lighting, contrast and safety modifications at home, transportation once driving is no longer possible, and paid in-home assistance.
Physical and emotional harm, and the loss of driving, reading, and the unaided daily activity that vision made possible.
Damages available to a spouse or family member for lost companionship and support, and — for families who lost a loved one — funeral expenses and loss of financial support.
In certain cases, Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly, and other parties in the chain of distribution may be held accountable for failing to warn patients and prescribing physicians about the risk of permanent vision loss, or for defects in the design of the drug itself. Where the evidence shows a manufacturer understood the risk and did not disclose it, punitive damages may also be available. Claims involving gastroparesis, bowel obstruction requiring surgery, and other serious GLP-1 injuries are also being reviewed.
See if You QualifyAt Parker Waichman LLP, we represent patients who lost their sight to a medication they were told was safe. Our attorneys work closely with clients, using thoughtful and practical strategies to protect your rights and pursue accountability where a manufacturer failed to warn patients and prescribing physicians about a known risk of sudden, permanent blindness.
Our attorneys concentrate on pharmaceutical injury claims, including cases involving permanent vision loss. The team reviewing your case has handled this category of injury before.
We come ready to take cases through to trial when defendants resist a fair resolution. The credible threat of trial is what drives settlements — and it's a posture not every firm can credibly hold.
You pay nothing up front and nothing during the case. Fees only apply if we recover compensation on your behalf.
This is an advertisement for the law firm Parker Waichman LLP, focused on handling claims and disputes related to injuries caused by Ozempic Vision Loss. The content on this webpage is provided for informational purposes only by Parker Waichman LLP. This site contains general information that may not be current, assumes certain findings of fact, and is for illustrative purposes only. Each case is unique, and a thorough review of your particular circumstances would be required to provide a proper assessment.